I have to say, this is a tough one. As important as it is to be consistent with the law, this bomber just might be notorious enough to be an exception.
I think they should be allowed to use what he said -- maybe just this once -- but then that brings up the question of how far does one have to go to have their Miranda rights postponed?
I find this all very confusing, and the conspiracy theories are not helping me at all, but I think that the evidence should be enough to prove that this guy is really the bomber (at least, I hope it is).
No comments:
Post a Comment